Paper survey

108. Monitoring Pipeline Movement Using Magnetic-Based Technology_ A Comparative Study

4
Yes No

108. Monitoring Pipeline Movement Using Magnetic-Based Technology_ A Comparative Study

3
Yes No
  • Too commercial
  • Other – please type your comments below

The technology is impressive, but the presentation was too commercial. On top of that, I'm not sure why the presentation format didn't follow the PPIM format.

108. Monitoring Pipeline Movement Using Magnetic-Based Technology_ A Comparative Study

3
Yes No
  • Too commercial
  • Not enough technical info or specific details

125. Advanced 3D Scour Modeling of Pipeline Water Crossings

4
Yes No

148. Assessing Geohazard Impact on Buried Pipeline Integrity Via Critical Strain-Based Failure Model

2
Yes No
  • Needed more or better examples of application in the field
  • Other – please type your comments below

It was too redundant. Too many technical and specific details. The presentation time was not managed well, therefore it was not concluded properly.

148. Assessing Geohazard Impact on Buried Pipeline Integrity Via Critical Strain-Based Failure Model

2
Yes No
  • Needed more or better examples of application in the field
  • Speaker was difficult to hear and/or understand
  • Other – please type your comments below

too much information for a 20min presentation. Was not able to cover all details of the topic, even using 30 minutes for presenting.

167. Practical Challenges of Using the RP 1183 Shape Parameter Methods

4
Yes No
  • Not enough technical info or specific details

A little more of a conclusion or path forward would have been appreciative. The ending had a little too much suspense, but otherwise it was very well presented.

167. Practical Challenges of Using the RP 1183 Shape Parameter Methods

4
Yes No

204. The Evolution of Competency Certification in the Pipeline Industry – the Pipeline Integrity Engineer

4
Yes No

Great content. Speaker was easy to understand. Will be able to take information back to my team. Thank you.

205. Identifying and Characterizing Corrosion Morphologies More Effectively with Tri-Axial MFL Signal Analysis

4
Yes No
  • Other – please type your comments below

It was a bit commercial.

215. State of Integrity 2025

4
Yes No

231. Complementary ILI Data-Driven Analysis to Identify the Interaction of Pipe Geohazards in Colombia’s Specific Geomorphological Conditions

4
Yes No
  • Other – please type your comments below

The biggest takeaway is that the interaction with the client will expand the application of any ILI and IE analysis.

231. Complementary ILI Data-Driven Analysis to Identify the Interaction of Pipe Geohazards in Colombia’s Specific Geomorphological Conditions

4
Yes No

233. EMAT-C Ultra Technology for Crack Inspection in Gas Pipelines

4
Yes No

248. How Hard Are Your Hard Spots_ A Deep-Dive into the Subjective Nature of Hardness Measurements

4
Yes No

252. Inspect the Unexpected_ An Iterative Approach to Developing the Only NPS 4 1.5D Triaxial MFL Combo Tool

4
Yes No

270. Managing Integrity Threats in CO2 Pipelines with ILI

4
Yes No

279. The Benefits of ILI Signal Review Analyses in ILI Run-To-Run Comparisons – a Case Study

4
Yes No

Great presentation! Provided information that can help us improve our ILI assessment.